April 2015:
A friend forwarded me a copy of this recidivism analysis from Texas Department of Criminal Justice prison rehabilitation programs, lamenting that "some of the TDCJ rehabilitation programs demonstrably make people worse."
Which ones? Four of nine programs showed participants' recidivism increased after two years in the free world, though after three years only two programs - specifically the Sex Offender Treatment Program and the Pre-Release Substance Abuse Program, the latter of which has consistently resulted in increased recidivism since the agency began studying it - displayed higher recidivism rates.
The two programs with worse outcomes after two years that came out slightly better after three were the Sex Offender Education Program and the Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative.
The SAFP program is the TDCJ rehab program with the best results and was the only one to make a double-digit difference. ..Source.. by Grits for Breakfast
Special: Truths: Harms: Murder: Archive: -or- Current; Vigilantism; Suicides; Related Deaths; Civil Com: Main Site -or- CC Court Actions |
Showing posts with label Recid 11%-20%. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Recid 11%-20%. Show all posts
New Hampshire Sex Offender Recidivism Rates
5-2-15 New Hampshire:It seems NH doesn't want the world to know the specific recidivism rates for sex offenders. The way the state compiles its recidivism rates is by groups: Violent, Property, Drug and Public Order. In addition their definition of recidivism is misleading "Recidivism rate refers to the percentage of a cohort, or sub-group, of offenders who are re-incarcerated in the state’s prison system as a result of a new sentence, a parole revocation or a probation revocation, within three years of their release." That making it impossible to get true recidivism rates by crime types.
With that in mind we looked at their 2014 report (2008 cohorts/releases) Appendix-B (very last page) and summing all sex related groups came cup with roughly 20% remembering that includes returns to prison for non sex crimes (Technical violations) as well.
They do have another page of all of their past recidivism reports on this site which folks may wish to review.
Predicting Relapse: A meta-Analysis of Sexual Offender Recidivism Studies
Labels:
/Canada,
1998,
Recid 11%-20%,
Treatment - Effective
Canada 1998:Abstract
Evidence from 61 follow-up studies was examined to identify the factors most strongly related to recidivism among sexual offenders. On average, the sexual offense recidivism rate was low (13,4%; n=23,393). There were, however, subgroups of offenders who recidivated at high rates.
Sexual offense recidivism was best predicted by measures of sexual deviancy (e.g., deviant sexual preferences, prior sexual offenses) and, to a lesser extent, by general criminological factors (e.g., age, total prior offenses). Those offenders who failed to complete treatment were at higher risk for re-offending than those who completed treatment.
The predictors of nonsexual violent recidivism and general (any) recidivism were similar to those predictors found among nonsexual criminals (e.g., prior violent offenses, age, juvenile delinquency). Our results suggest that applied risk assessments of sexual offenders should consider separately the offender's risk for sexual and nonsexual recidivism. ..more.. by R. Karl Hanson and Monique T. Bussière, Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
Recidivism Rates of Sexual Offenders up to 7 Years Later Does Treatment Matter?
2005 New Jersey:
Abstract
This article critically reviews the evidence on sex offender treatment and subsequently provides new estimates on short-term recidivism among sexual offenders released from prison in New Jersey.
The sample of male sex offenders is drawn from the Adult Diagnostic Treatment Center (ADTC), New Jersey’s only sex-offender-specific prison, and the general population of nine prisons within the state of New Jersey.
The ADTC sample receives treatment while incarcerated (n = 495), whereas no treatment is provided to the offenders in the general population sample (n = 223). Overall, 33% of the total sample (N = 718) commits a new offense. Of the total sample, 14% commits a new sexual offense and 24% commits a new nonsexual offense.
Significant differences exist between the ADTC and the general population samples with respect to nonsexual reoffending only. In the final analysis, treatment appears to matter in terms of a reduction in recidivism but not in conventionally expected ways. ..Source.. by Kristen M. Zgoba1 and Leonore M. J. Simon
Abstract
This article critically reviews the evidence on sex offender treatment and subsequently provides new estimates on short-term recidivism among sexual offenders released from prison in New Jersey.
The sample of male sex offenders is drawn from the Adult Diagnostic Treatment Center (ADTC), New Jersey’s only sex-offender-specific prison, and the general population of nine prisons within the state of New Jersey.
The ADTC sample receives treatment while incarcerated (n = 495), whereas no treatment is provided to the offenders in the general population sample (n = 223). Overall, 33% of the total sample (N = 718) commits a new offense. Of the total sample, 14% commits a new sexual offense and 24% commits a new nonsexual offense.
Significant differences exist between the ADTC and the general population samples with respect to nonsexual reoffending only. In the final analysis, treatment appears to matter in terms of a reduction in recidivism but not in conventionally expected ways. ..Source.. by Kristen M. Zgoba1 and Leonore M. J. Simon
Rhode Island: Sex Offender Recidivism Rates
January 2013 Rhode Island:The Rhode Island DOC has this current study: 2009 Recidivism Study: Two Year Follow Up (Value added link)
Summary of Findings
-Of the 3,699 offenders released in 2009 from RIDOC, 31% returned under sentence within 1 year of release. By 24 months post-release, 42% had returned under sentence. This constitutes
a 4% decrease in 2-year post release rates from the 2004 cohort.
-Offenders who were released from Home Confinement had lower recidivism rates than those released from secure facilties. This was true for the 2004 cohort as well.
-Forty-one percent (41%) of prison offenders and 43% of jail offenders recidivated within 2 years of release.
-For pretrial re-admissions, 1 in 2 offenders returned as awaiting trail detainees within 24 months post release for a two year recidivism rate of 50%. This is an 8% decline for two year rates from the 2004 cohort.
-Only 4% of pretrial 2-year recidivists were female. This is a significant decrease from the 2004 cohort where 12% of awaiting trial recidivists were female.
eAdvocate notes: Since they do not report a SAME-CRIME sex offender recidivism rate, we were able -using facts from the study- to calculate a GENERAL RECIDIVISM rate for sex offenders, and it comes out to be 14.5%. Here is how we did that:
At the link you will find a "recidivism study" for all types of offenses.....
Open it and do a PAGE-SEARCH for "sex," BINGO after 2-years sex offenders had a 27% recidivism rate (pg-2).
OK, but what does that mean? What is their definition of recidivism? (pg-1)"Someone who was released from RI-DOC and returned within 2-years." Doesn't say "returned for the same crime type" so it is a general recidivism rate.
Now we need to know if they include "technical violations" in their rates. They do not use the phrase "technical violations [tried a pg-search] but instead see pg-2 [left column] "1/2 were re-sentenced for a new crime, and 31%+15%=47% were parole/probation violators."
Next, pg-2 also says "Of the 103 SOs released during 2009, 27% (28 of 103) recidivated within 2-years." But 47% of the 28 were for "parole violations" [not new crimes] = 13, so 15 were for new crimes, or 14.5% recidivism. However, thats for ANY kind of crime, a general recidivism rate, not just sex offenses.
Finally, 14.5% for any kind of crime, is the best we have for this state, and we should note it that way.
Sex Offender Recidivism in Missouri and Community Correction Options
Labels:
- Missouri,
2006,
Recid 11%-20%
June 2006 Missouri:Using data provided by the Missouri Department of Corrections, a sample of men in all offense categories released from Missouri prison in 1998 was analyzed. The sample was analyzed by demographic factors, criminal history, and institutional behavior. The results show that Missouri sex offenders were more likely to be older, white, and have less educational and employment defi cits than the general prison population. Sex offenders were signifi cantly more likely to have consistent employment histories, have been convicted of a prior sex crime, provide moderate risk to the public, have a higher salient factor score, have lower institutional risk scores, and to have spent more time in prison. Sex offenders spent signifi cantly more time in prison than offenders who had committed other types of crime.
Consistent with prior studies on prisoner recidivism, inmates convicted of property crimes had the highest recidivism rates. Sex offenders had the lowest rates of recidivism and the Missouri rates were consistent with national averages. Little variation in recidivism outcomes was observed for sex offender types in the current sample. Although the rates of recidivism vary across offender groups, when these men do recidivate, they are more likely to commit the type of offense for which they were previously imprisoned. For sex offenders in Missouri, however, a smaller percentage were convicted of another sex crime. Analyses to determine which independent variables were predictors of recidivism could not be meaningfully conducted for sex offenders due to the small sample size. Future studies should consider recidivism outcomes from a multi-year cohort of sex offenders.
Comparison of Recidivism Rates (pg-7)
Recidivism statistics by offense type are displayed in Table 7. Recidivism, in the current analyses, is classifi ed as a new conviction for any crime. There is substantial variation in the manner in which recidivism has been measured (Maltz 1984) in past research studies. The reconviction measure is incomplete as it fails to capture criminal behavior that is not reported to the police or does not result in an arrest or reconviction. Using the reconviction measure may increase the chances of Type II errors. Although concerns over measurement are common to research of this type, care should be exercised when making cross-study comparisons of recidivism rates.
Consistent with prior studies on prisoner recidivism, inmates convicted of property crimes had the highest reconviction rates at 47.4 percent. This was followed by prisoners convicted of personal offenses (42.3 percent), other offenses (40.4 percent), and drug offenses (37.5 percent). There was little variation in time to re-conviction among offender groups. Men who were convicted of personal offenses had the shortest times to reconviction. Although, there was little variation in time to failure among sample groups as the average time to reconviction was approximately four years.
Sex offenders had the lowest rates of reconviction (19 percent). The recidivism rate for the current sample is consistent with national studies of recidivism. Recent studies estimate that approximately 10 percent to 15 percent of sex offenders recidivate within 5 years (Hanson and Bussiere 1998). There is also evidence to suggest that reimprisonment rates may be higher. In a study of recidivism outcomes of prisoners released from 12 states, 39 percent of sex offenders were returned back to prison within three years (Langan, Schmitt, and Durose 2003). In addition, 30% percent of inmates released from Missouri prisons in 1998 were retuned to prison within 3 years – 35 percent within five. The difference in statistics reflects the measurement of recidivism. Reimprisonment rates include individuals who were returned to prison for a new offense or a technical violation. The reconviction measure does not include technical violations; therefore, the recidivism rate, as determined by the reconviction outcome, will be lower than a measure that represents reimprisonment. ...continued... Prepared for: Missouri Sentencing Advisory Commission
The Impact of Prison-Based Treatment on Sex Offender Recidivism: Evidence from Minnesota
March 2010 Minnesota:The Minnesota Department of Corrections (DOC) recently completed a study that examined the impact of DOC sex offender treatment programming on recidivism. The study examined 2,040 sex offenders released from Minnesota prisons between 1990 and 2003. The average follow-up period to track recidivism for the 2,040 offenders was 9.3 years.
The DOC has provided sex offender treatment since 1978 when it opened the Transitional Sex Offender Treatment Program at the Minnesota Correctional Facility-Lino Lakes. Since its inception more than three decades ago, sex offender treatment programming has evolved to keep pace with changing practices in the fi eld. Consistent with evidence-based practices, the DOC places priority on treating sex offenders who pose a moderate to high risk for reoffending and provides treatment designed to address the specifi c factors that place offenders at risk for offending. ..Source: Full Report.. ..Source: Research in Brief.. Minnesota Dep't of Corrections
Key Findings
�� Sex offender treatment provided within the DOC reduced the risk of rearrest for a new sex offense by 27 percent
�� Participation in prison-based treatment lowered the risk of rearrest for a violent crime (both sex and non-sex offenses) by 18 percent
�� Prison-based treatment decreased the risk of rearrest for any offense by 12 percent

All Minnesota DOC Publications
The Impact of Prison-Based Treatment on Sex Offender Recidivism
Labels:
- Minnesota,
2009,
Recid 11%-20%,
Recid Follow-up 10 yr
September 2009:Using a retrospective quasi-experimental design, this study evaluates the effectiveness of prison-based treatment by examining recidivism outcomes among 2,040 sex offenders released from Minnesota prisons between 1990 and 2003 (average follow-up period of 9.3 years). To reduce observed selection bias, the authors used propensity score matching to create a comparison group of 1,020 untreated sex offenders who were not significantly different from the 1,020 treated offenders. In addition, intent-to-treat analyses and the Rosenbaum bounds method were used to test the sensitivity of the findings to treatment refuser and unobserved selection bias. Results from the Cox regression analyses revealed that participating in treatment significantly reduced the hazard ratio for rearrest by 27% for sexual recidivism, 18% for violent recidivism, and 12% for general recidivism. These findings are consistent with the growing body of research supporting the effectiveness of cognitive—behavioral treatment for sex offenders.
For the remainder of this study: by Grant Duwe, Minnesota Department of Corrections, St. Paul, AND Robin A. Goldman, Minnesota Department of Corrections, Lino Lakes
Sex offender recidivism rates below expectations: more than 80% of sex offenders who underwent treatment did not reoffend
December 2002:More than 80% of sex offenders who have undergone treatment do not reoffend within 15 years, according to preliminary results of a 15-year prospective study of 626 individuals reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
The study did not examine the efficacy of various forms of treatment, but it did find that sexual offenders who were compliant with their treatment were less likely to reoffend than those who were noncompliant.
The results of the study were reported by Dr. Fred Berlin, who is director of the National Institute for the Study, Prevention, and Treatment of Sexual Trauma, Baltimore, and by Gerard J. McGlone. Ph.D., a clinical fellow at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
The results are "a far cry from what people often think is occurring, particularly with a group of patients who are this serious, people with multiple prior offenses, people with pedophilia," Dr. Berlin said. "The notion that most of these people would quickly be back into trouble was simply not true."
The preliminary 15-year data update the group's 5-year study of the same individuals (Am. J. Forensic Psychiatry 12[3]:5-28, 1991). That study found an overall 9.7% recidivism rate.
The estimated rate of additional recidivism for the following 10 years was 9.3%, for a total of 19% over 15 years.
Both studies followed 626 individuals treated at the Johns Hopkins sexual disorders clinic between 1978 and 1990. Of those, 406 were pedophiles, 111 were exhibitionists, and 109 were characterized as "sexually aggressive," with most diagnosed as "paraphilic disorder not otherwise specified" or antisocial personality disorder.
The patients underwent a variety of treatments at the clinic, including individual, group, and family therapy. Approximately 40% of the patients received an-tiandrogenic drugs in an effort to lessen their sex drive.
Investigators examined three local and national databases for evidence of recidivism in the 5-year study.
Anyone who was charged with a sexual crime was included; conviction was not necessary.
For the 15-year follow-up, investigators have so far examined only Maryland state databases and have not yet examined national databases.
The 5-year study showed that 7.4% of pedophiles, 4.6% of sexual aggressives, and 23.4% of exhibitionists reoffended sexually The 15-year study added an additional 8.6% of pedophiles (total 16%), 10% of sexual aggressives (total 14.6%), and 10.8% of exhibitionists, (total 34.2%), the investigators said.
For the 15-year study, investigators have not yet reported recidivism rates for compliant vs. noncompliant patients. These data were reported at the 5-year follow-up.
For pedophiles, 2.9% of the treatment compliant and 11.1% of the noncompliant reoffended sexually For sexual aggressives, 2.8% of the compliant and 8.1% of the noncompliant reoffended sexually
And for exhibitionists, 12.5% of the compliant and 32.6% of the noncompliant reoffended sexually
On the issue of exhibitionists, Dr. Berlin observed, "Even with treatment, this is a very driven, compulsive disorder. The good news, though, is that in almost every instance where there was recidivism, it was a non-hands-on offense.
"These people were not recidivating by doing other things. With very few exceptions they were exposing. ... The more dangerous patients, the ones who had been sexually aggressive or who were pedophiles, had the lowest recidivism rates.
Nonsexual recidivism rates were considerably higher in all groups. At the 5-year follow-up, 9.2% of compliant pe dophiles and 26.2% of noncompliant pedophiles were charged with a nonsexual offense such as burglary. Among sexual aggressives, the rates were 14% of compliant patients and 29.7% of non-compliant patients. And among exhibitionists the rates were 10.4% of compliant patients and 4 1.9% of non compliant patients.
The study's results have important public policy implications, Dr. Berlin said.
Over the years, for example, legislatures in all 50 states and the District of Columbia have passed numerous laws involving the civil commitment, registration, and community notification of sexual offenders.
In addition, a federal law that took effect recently requires the states to notify the public about sexual offenders who are enrolled or working at college campuses.
The idea behind these registries and public notifications is the notion that sexual offenders are difficult to rehabilitate and have a particularly high rate of recidivism. (See related story page 5.)
But the data show that sexual offenders actually have a lower rate of recidivism that those who commit other kinds of crimes.
And some experts speculate that these new laws just might have the unintended consequence of actually increasing the risk of recidivism.
"We think that many of the people who seem to be doing well in our treatment program have done well because they could get jobs," Dr. Berlin said. "They could fit into their community.
"We now have these registries. Are [sexual offenders who have been punished and released going to be able to get housing? Are they going to be able to get work? Are we inadvertently actually going to make it more difficult for some of these people?"
..Source.. Clinical Psychiatry News, By Robert Finn
COPYRIGHT 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning
"According to a 1991 study of 626 patients conducted by Berlin's institute, five years after they had been treated through chemical castration fewer than ten percent had committed sexual offenses again. Of the most compliant patients, fewer than 5 percent committed new sexual acts. (Id.)"
OH- Ten-Year Recidivism Follow-Up Of 1989 Sex Offender Releases
April 2001:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The baseline recidivism rate of sex offenders followed-up for ten years after release from prison was 34%. (That is both sex offenses and non sex offenses and technical violations.)
This rate was comprised of:
Recommitment for a New Crime 22.3% (Sex Offense 8.0% -and- Non-Sex Offense 14.3%)
Recommitment for a Technical Violation 11.7% (Sex Offense 1.3% -and- Sex Lapse 1.7% -and- Non-sex Related 8.7%)
The total sex-related recidivism rate, including technical violations of
supervision conditions, was 11.0%.
Recidivism rates differed considerably based on a victim typology:
| Sex Offender Type | General Recidivism | Sex Recidivism |
| Rapists (adult victims) | 56.6% | 17.5% |
| Child Molester – extrafamilial | 29.2% | 8.7% |
| Child Molester – incest | 13.2% | 7.4% |
Sex offenders who returned for a new sex related offense did so within a few years of release. Of all the sex offenders who came back to an Ohio prison for a new sex offense, one half did so within two years, and two-thirds within three years.
Paroled Sex offenders completing basic sex offender programming (level 1) while incarcerated appeared to have a somewhat lower recidivism rate than those who did not have programming. This was true both for recidivism of any type (33.9% with programming recidivated compared with 55.3% without programming) and sex-related recidivism (7.1% with programming recidivated compared with 16.5% without programming). ..more.. by State of Ohio, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



