We now have added "Informational Posts" which are tidbits of information that may come in handy at some point.
Showing posts with label Sex Offender Reentry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sex Offender Reentry. Show all posts

Criminal Justice Debt: A Barrier to Reentry

10-6-2010 National:

Executive Summary
Many states are imposing new and often onerous “user fees” on individuals with criminal convic­tions. Yet far from being easy money, these fees impose severe – and often hidden – costs on com­munities, taxpayers, and indigent people convicted of crimes. They create new paths to prison for those unable to pay their debts and make it harder to find employment and housing as well to meet child support obligations.

This report examines practices in the fifteen states with the highest prison populations, which to­gether account for more than 60 percent of all state criminal filings. We focused primarily on the proliferation of “user fees,” financial obligations imposed not for any traditional criminal justice purpose such as punishment, deterrence, or rehabilitation but rather to fund tight state budgets.

Across the board, we found that states are introducing new user fees, rais­ing the dollar amounts of existing fees, and intensifying the collection of fees and other forms of criminal justice debt such as fines and restitution. But in the rush to collect, made all the more intense by the fiscal crises in many states, no one is considering the ways in which the resulting debt can undermine reentry prospects, pave the way back to prison or jail, and result in yet more costs to the public. ..Source.. by Alicia Bannon, Mitali Nagrecha, Rebekah Diller

Lifers on the Outside: Sex Offenders and Disintegrative Shaming

February 1, 2009:

Abstract:
This article examines the effects of labeling though informal and formal sanctions on sex offender reintegration, using qualitative analysis from a probability sample of 153 registered sex offenders in four counties in the Commonwealth of Virginia. It also provides an overview of sex offender legislation and literature. Results of the study indicate that the majority of respondents experienced negative treatment because of their status as a sex offender. Results also indicate that formal and informal sanctions are stifling opportunities for sex offenders to be fully reintegrated into society and that treatment programs are not as effective as they could be. Implications for sex offender policy and further research are discussed. by Monica L. P. Robbers, Marymount University, Arlington, Virginia, Monica.robbers@marymount.edu

Available from Sage Publications: by Monica L. P. Robbers PhD: Lifers on the Outside: Sex Offenders and Disintegrative Shaming . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 53, No. 1, 5-28 (2009)


eAdvocate note: Reviewing this study was interesting but there was one chart which caught my eye, it follows:

The Effect of Megan’s Law on Sex Offender Reintegration

2005:

Abstract:
The purpose of this study is to better understand the positive and negative, intended and unintended, consequences of community notification on sex offenders’ rehabilitation and reintegration. A sample of 183 convicted male sex offenders from Florida completed the survey. Overall, about one third of participants had experienced dire events, such as the loss of a job or home, threats or harassment, or property damage. Physical assaultwas a relatively rare occurrence. The majority identified negative effects, such as stress, isolation, loss of relationships, fear, shame, embarrassment, and hopelessness. Some participants noted positive effects of Megan’s Law, including motivation to prevent reoffense and increased honesty with friends and family. Few sex offenders believed that communities are safer because of Megan’s Law, and more than half reported that the information posted about them on Florida’s Internet registry was incorrect. Implications for practice and policy are discussed.

..Source.. by Jill S. Levenson, Lynn University and Leo P. Cotter, The S.H.A.R.E. Program

Levenson, J.S. & Cotter, L.P. (2005). The impact of Megan’s Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 21(1), 49-66.

Residence Restrictions and their impact on sex offender reintegration, rehabilitation, and recidivism

June 2007:

Abstract:
Sex offender registration and notification have led to increased public awareness of sex offenders living among us. Fearing that predators living in residential communities might cause harm to children and other vulnerable individuals, citizens and politicians have lobbied for laws which prohibit convicted sex offenders from living near schools, parks, and other places frequented by children. The purpose of these laws is purportedly to decrease opportunities for sex offenders to have contact with children, ultimately reducing the risk of child sexual abuse. This paper will review the history of residence restrictions policies, their effectiveness, and their observed and potential unintended consequences. ..more.. by Jill S. Levenson

Levenson, J.S. (2007). Residence restrictions and their impact on sex offender reintegration, rehabilitation, and recidivism. ATSA Forum, Volume XVIII, No. 2, Spring 2007.

Megan's law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders

July 2007

Abstract
Community notification, known as Megan's Law, provides the public with information about known sex offenders in an effort to assist parents and potential victims to protect themselves from dangerous predators. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of community notification on the lives of registered sex offenders.

Two hundred and thirty-nine sex offenders in Connecticut and Indiana were surveyed. The negative consequences that occurred with the greatest frequency included job loss, threats and harassment, property damage, and suffering of household members. A minority of sex offenders reported housing disruption or physical violence following community notification. The majority experienced psychosocial distress such as depression, shame, and hopelessness.

Recommendations are made for community notification policies that rely on empirically derived risk assessment classification systems in order to better inform the public about sex offenders' danger while minimizing the obstacles that interfere with successful community reintegration. ..more.. by Jill S. Levenson, Ph.D., David A. D'Amora, M.S., LPC, CFC, Andrea L. Hern, M.A

Levenson, J.S. & Cotter, L.P. (2005). The impact of Megan’s Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 21(1), 49-66.

Controlling Sex Offender Reentry - Jessica's Law Measures in California

2006 (California Reentry Study):

This is an in-depth analysis of Prop-83 in California and what it was based on, much of which is beliefs of one lawmaker, Senator George Runner and his wife Assemblywoman Sharon Runner. These folks spearheaded the Sexual Predator Punishment and Control Act which was based on many false beliefs. The study focuses on the renentry of sex offenders into communites.

Unfortunately this study is such that it cannot be copied -even portions- hence this short paragraph about it.

For the remainder of the study by Jason Peckenpaugh