November 2012:
Abstract:
This study seeks to examine important components of our nation’s sex offender tracking and monitoring systems, with a focus on risk assessment and sexual recidivism (measured by re-arrest). The principal aims of this study were fourfold: (1) to compare the nationally recommended Adam Walsh Act (AWA) classification tiers with actuarial risk assessment instruments in their respective abilities to identify high risk individuals and recidivists; (2) to evaluate the predictive accuracy of existing state risk assessment classification schemes; (3) to examine the distribution of risk assessment scores within and across tier categories as defined by the AWA; and (4) to examine the role of offender age in recidivism risk across the adult lifespan.
Data were collected from 1,789 adult sex offenders in four states (Minnesota, New Jersey, Florida and South Carolina) to inform these analyses. Variables including offender demographics and criminal history information, coded from state criminal justice records, were used to score actuarial risk assessment instruments and sex offender registry information. On average, we found that the recidivism rate was approximately 5% at five years and 10% at 10 years. AWA tier was unrelated to sexual recidivism, except in Florida, where it was inversely associated with recidivism. Actuarial measures and existing state tiering systems both showed better predictive validity than AWA tiers. Finally, offender age was found to have a significant protective effect for sexual reoffending, with older offenders showing a decreased risk for sexual recidivism.
The findings indicate that the current AWA classification scheme is likely to result in a system that is less effective in protecting the public than the classification systems currently implemented in the states studied. Policy makers should strongly consider substantial revisions of the AWA classification system to better incorporate evidence-based models of sex offender risk assessment and management. ..Source.. by Kristen M. Zgoba, PI, New Jersey Department of Corrections -and- Michael Miner, Co-PI, University of Minnesota Medical School -and- Raymond Knight, Co-Investigator Brandeis University -and- Elizabeth Letourneau, Co-Investigator, Johns Hopkins University -and- Jill Levenson, Co-Investigator, Lynn University -and- David Thornton, Co-Investigator, Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center
Special: Truths: Harms: Murder: Archive: -or- Current; Vigilantism; Suicides; Related Deaths; Civil Com: Main Site -or- CC Court Actions |
Showing posts with label Recid Follow-up 10 yr. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Recid Follow-up 10 yr. Show all posts
The Impact of Prison-Based Treatment on Sex Offender Recidivism: Evidence from Minnesota
March 2010 Minnesota:The Minnesota Department of Corrections (DOC) recently completed a study that examined the impact of DOC sex offender treatment programming on recidivism. The study examined 2,040 sex offenders released from Minnesota prisons between 1990 and 2003. The average follow-up period to track recidivism for the 2,040 offenders was 9.3 years.
The DOC has provided sex offender treatment since 1978 when it opened the Transitional Sex Offender Treatment Program at the Minnesota Correctional Facility-Lino Lakes. Since its inception more than three decades ago, sex offender treatment programming has evolved to keep pace with changing practices in the fi eld. Consistent with evidence-based practices, the DOC places priority on treating sex offenders who pose a moderate to high risk for reoffending and provides treatment designed to address the specifi c factors that place offenders at risk for offending. ..Source: Full Report.. ..Source: Research in Brief.. Minnesota Dep't of Corrections
Key Findings
�� Sex offender treatment provided within the DOC reduced the risk of rearrest for a new sex offense by 27 percent
�� Participation in prison-based treatment lowered the risk of rearrest for a violent crime (both sex and non-sex offenses) by 18 percent
�� Prison-based treatment decreased the risk of rearrest for any offense by 12 percent

All Minnesota DOC Publications
The Impact of Prison-Based Treatment on Sex Offender Recidivism
Labels:
- Minnesota,
2009,
Recid 11%-20%,
Recid Follow-up 10 yr
September 2009:Using a retrospective quasi-experimental design, this study evaluates the effectiveness of prison-based treatment by examining recidivism outcomes among 2,040 sex offenders released from Minnesota prisons between 1990 and 2003 (average follow-up period of 9.3 years). To reduce observed selection bias, the authors used propensity score matching to create a comparison group of 1,020 untreated sex offenders who were not significantly different from the 1,020 treated offenders. In addition, intent-to-treat analyses and the Rosenbaum bounds method were used to test the sensitivity of the findings to treatment refuser and unobserved selection bias. Results from the Cox regression analyses revealed that participating in treatment significantly reduced the hazard ratio for rearrest by 27% for sexual recidivism, 18% for violent recidivism, and 12% for general recidivism. These findings are consistent with the growing body of research supporting the effectiveness of cognitive—behavioral treatment for sex offenders.
For the remainder of this study: by Grant Duwe, Minnesota Department of Corrections, St. Paul, AND Robin A. Goldman, Minnesota Department of Corrections, Lino Lakes
The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) Recidivism Studies
June 2008:The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) has conducted two sex offender recidivism studies that are very interesting. They were published on June of 2008:
Study 1) A 5-year study of 4,204 sex offender parolees, who were released in 2002 and followed until the end of 2007. Of the 4,204 parolees released 135 were returned to prison with a new sex offense conviction, a 3.21% recidivism rate. As to non sex offenses, 197 were returned to prison for a 4.69% non sex offense recidivism rate.
Study 2) A 10-year study of 3,577 sex offender parolees, who were released in 1997 and followed until the end of 2007. Of the 3,577 parolees released 121 were returned to prison with a new sex offense conviction, a 3.38% recidivism rate. As to non sex offenses, 137 were returned to prison for a 3.83% non sex offense recidivism rate.
In both studies the majority of the recidivism occurred in the first year ( 86 of 135 for 64% -v- 79 of 121 for 65% respectively). Again in both studies the majority of non sex offense convictions occurred in the first year ( 114 of 197 for 58% -v- 89 of 137 for 65% respectively). Technical violations of parole, although 47.05% and 49.06% respectively, were far less than other parolees who showed 60-70%.
The two studies virtually validated each other on a few points, remembering, each study had different parolees.

Arizona Recidivism
1998 (Fact Sheet):FACT SHEET 98-06
SEX OFFENDER RECIDIVISM
During September 1998, the Research Unit of the Arizona Department of Corrections. (ADC) completed an analysis of sex offenders released from ADC custody over the ten-year period from July 1988 through June 1998. A released offender was included in the study if he or she was serving time for one or more sex offenses just prior to release from incarceration. Offenders were tracked only with reference to the first release from a given criminal sentence.
The record of each targeted sex offender was reviewed to determine if the offender returned to the custody of the Department by June 30, 1998, and if so, under what circumstances. Returns for technical violations were distinguished from returns with new felony convictions. In cases of new convictions, information was recorded concerning the nature of all new conviction offenses. Preliminary findings from the study are as follows:
2,444 sex offenders were released from ADC custody over the ten-year period. The average period of follow-up (to June 30, 1998) for all sex offenders was 54.5 months. Among the 2,444, 509 or 20.8 % returned at least once to the custody of the Department, including 346 or 14.2% with new felony convictions. While sex offenders returned to prison for a variety of new crimes, 78 or 3.2% returned for a new felony sex offense, and an additional 90 or 3.7% returned for a new violent felony offense.
Among the 2,444 released sex offenders, 1,087 (44.5%) were released to the supervision of ADC parole officers. Among this group, eight (8) or 0.7% were found to have committed a new sex offense during the period of parole supervision. Among the eight (8), one (1) or 0.1% returned to custody with a new sex offense conviction while still under supervision. The remaining seven (7) were returned to custody after termination of the period of supervision.
The most serious new sex offense committed by the 78 sex offense recidivists was:
Child molestation or sexual conduct with a minor 34(44%)
Rape or sexual assault 22(28%)
Sexual indecency (exposing) 14(18%)
Sexual abuse 8(10%)
Among the 78 sex offense recidivists, the timing of the commission of new sex offenses was as follows:
35 (45%) were committed within the first year after release;
19 (24%) were committed within the second year after release;
8 (10%) were committed within the third year after release;
3 (4%) were committed within the fourth year after release;
6 (8%) were committed within the fifth year after release;
4 (5%) were committed within the sixth year after release;
3 (4%) were committed within the seventh year after release.
The Department of Corrections is currently working with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to determine if data can be accessed for the completion of the second phase of the research. Further study will be undertaken if data is available to ascertain if any of the offenders in the study have re-offended and have entered secure custody in other jurisdictions. It is anticipated that the report on the first phase of the research will be published before the end of the year. For further information, please contact the Department of Corrections.
For the remainder: by Arizona Dep't of Corrections
OH- Ten-Year Recidivism Follow-Up Of 1989 Sex Offender Releases
April 2001:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The baseline recidivism rate of sex offenders followed-up for ten years after release from prison was 34%. (That is both sex offenses and non sex offenses and technical violations.)
This rate was comprised of:
Recommitment for a New Crime 22.3% (Sex Offense 8.0% -and- Non-Sex Offense 14.3%)
Recommitment for a Technical Violation 11.7% (Sex Offense 1.3% -and- Sex Lapse 1.7% -and- Non-sex Related 8.7%)
The total sex-related recidivism rate, including technical violations of
supervision conditions, was 11.0%.
Recidivism rates differed considerably based on a victim typology:
| Sex Offender Type | General Recidivism | Sex Recidivism |
| Rapists (adult victims) | 56.6% | 17.5% |
| Child Molester – extrafamilial | 29.2% | 8.7% |
| Child Molester – incest | 13.2% | 7.4% |
Sex offenders who returned for a new sex related offense did so within a few years of release. Of all the sex offenders who came back to an Ohio prison for a new sex offense, one half did so within two years, and two-thirds within three years.
Paroled Sex offenders completing basic sex offender programming (level 1) while incarcerated appeared to have a somewhat lower recidivism rate than those who did not have programming. This was true both for recidivism of any type (33.9% with programming recidivated compared with 55.3% without programming) and sex-related recidivism (7.1% with programming recidivated compared with 16.5% without programming). ..more.. by State of Ohio, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
