We now have added "Informational Posts" which are tidbits of information that may come in handy at some point.
Showing posts with label Treatment Programs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Treatment Programs. Show all posts

Bodenweiser charged for refusing polygraph, therapy

6-29-15 Delaware:

When former state Senate hopeful Eric R. Bodenweiser testified at his child rape trial last year, he swore he did not force a youngster to repeatedly have sex with him more than a quarter-century ago. The trial ended in a hung jury.

When he pleaded “no contest” in March to two counts of unlawful sexual contact and was put on probation, Bodenweiser didn’t admit to sex crimes, only that he would not fight the state’s accusations.

Authorities have since charged him with violating probation because he has refused to to speak candidly about his crime, both in a lie detector test and group therapy sessions ordered by corrections officials.

Bodenweiser, on his lawyer’s advice, has asserting his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination because he fears being charged with perjury over his trial denials. Bodenweiser’s stance has set up a legal battle with constitutional implications for Delaware.

Bodenweiser, now 56, “made a very conscious decision at trial to perjure himself,” prosecutor David Hume IV wrote in an email this month to defense attorney Joseph A. Hurley. He “created this situation and he will have to deal with the consequences.”

Hurley has since argued in a 12-page motion that decisions in other state and federal courts have consistently upheld the right of criminals and suspects, even convicted sex offenders, to remain silent about potentially incriminating information.

Pedophilia: Diagnostic Concepts Treatment, and Ethical Considerations

The full paper by Dr Berlin, is here.



Scandal creates contempt for Catholic clergy

A steady stream of revelations and civil lawsuits over child sexual abuse by priests seem to signal the Catholic Church has the biggest problem with clerical scandals, but experts deny it is a hot zone of exploitation.

Insurance companies, child advocacy groups and religion scholars say there is no evidence that Catholic clergy are more likely to be involved in sexual misconduct than other clergy or professionals. Yet ongoing civil litigation of decades-old cases against a church with deep pockets keeps the Catholic Church in the headlines.

“There is no plausible evidence that Catholic priests are gangs of sexual predators, as they are being portrayed,” said Pennsylvania State University Prof. Philip Jenkins, eminent religion and history scholar, and a non-Catholic who’s studied the church’s abuse problems for 20 years.

Missouri: Many prison inmates don’t finish sex offender treatment

Missouri 4-9-2008:

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Many convicted sex offenders ordered to get treatment while in prison aren’t completing the program. Some refuse or are too sick, but for some there isn’t enough space.

Prison officials said Wednesday that there are 176 people waiting to enroll in the treatment program because there isn’t enough money and space to cover everyone. The treatment is required when someone is convicted of certain sexual offenses such as rape, forcible sodomy and child molestation.

According to the most recent data available, 460 people who were ordered to get treatment for sex offenders left prison between July 1, 2006, and June 30, 2007. More than 80 percent participated in the program, but only 241 finished it.

The treatment program is offered at two prisons for men and a separate one for women.

Under state law, those who don’t complete the program aren’t eligible for even conditional release and have to serve their entire sentences. But when those inmates leave prison, they don’t have to follow probation and parole rules.

“We don’t like that,” said Brian Hauswirth, a spokesman for the Department of Corrections. “The whole idea is to release them in the community at some point, and we want them to get treatment and then be under supervision.”
Of the nearly 7,000 registered sex offenders in Missouri, Hauswirth said 1,600 to 1,800 are placed under supervision after they leave prison. But most aren’t convicted of another sex crime.

Over a 23-year period that ended in June, about 5 percent of sex offenders were sent back to prison after committing another sexual offense. More than 10 percent returned to prison after committing a nonsexual offense.

The recidivism rate for those who complete the treatment program is even lower. Hauswirth said that from 1994 to 2002, only about 2 percent of those inmates who completed treatment program were convicted of another sex crime.
Discussion about the treatment program was prompted by a legislative committee reviewing how the Department of Corrections handled the parole of a man who is accused of raping and killing a former St. Louis newspaper editor.

According to media accounts, Brian Walters, who was charged with the killing, admitted that he had fantasized about committing a sexual assault. The Joint Committee on Corrections is examining why Walters wasn’t enrolled in the Missouri Sex Offender Program.

“There are people who are released, and some are released without getting the (treatment) and these are the known sex offenders,” Corrections Department Director Larry Crawford said. “Here’s a person who was not convicted of any sex offense, and if he says he has these tendencies, what should he get?”

Crawford said it’s possible that if Walters had started the treatment program, which is intense and takes more than a year to finish, he would have later denied having the fantasies.

Lawmakers on the committee asked prison officials about the parole process and how probation decisions are made. Several lawmakers also questioned why there was so much focus on a single case.

“You’ve got to question really what we’re doing here,” said committee chairman Mark Bruns, R-Jefferson City. “If the victim would have been a homeless drug addict, would there have been this much attention?” ..more.. by AP

Comparing Various Treatment Options for Sexual Offenders and Their Efficacy Rates

June 2014:

Abstract

The assessment and treatment of sexual offending has varied greatly within the last 40 years. The establishment of sexual offender treatment began in the 1970's where medical officials focused on reducing criminal psychological or pathologies with the use of physical/chemical castration and various pharmaceutical remedies.

As treatment ideals evolved, cognitive-behavioral treatment became the new focus by way of having the offender accomplish a list of goals. These specific goals allowed the offender to take criminal responsibility for their actions, allowed them to identify and manage their personal problems/behaviors, taught them how to recognize their deviant behavior while teaching them how to eliminate their Cognitive Distortions (CDs) (Terry, 2013).

This paper will explain the various treatment programs available to sexual offenders as well as outlying their respective efficacy rates. ..Source.. by Dr. Cassandra Emery

Improving Illinois' Response to Sexual Offenses Committed by Youth

3-25-2014 Illinois:

Recommendations for Law, Policy, and Practice

The Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission performed extensive scientific and legal research to understand the complex issues of the behavior, treatment, and rehabilitation of juvenile sex offenders and the extent to which current knowledge has resulted in practical applications throughout the state.

The findings from this research shaped the Commission’s recommendations, which aim to increase public safety, improve outcomes for young offenders, and allocate scarce public resources effectively.

To do this, Illinois should implement evidence-informed policies for professionals who work with victims and youth offenders; provide individualized, community-based, family-focused treatments and services; and repeal counter-productive sex offender registration requirements and categorical restrictions for young people. ..Full access to reports.. by Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission

Treating sexual offenders: how did we get here and where are we headed?

January 2014:

Abstract

The field of sexual offender treatment has drawn inspiration from two major social movements: The women's movement, which defined sexual victimisation as a serious social problem, and correctional rehabilitation, which provided the vision and methods to reintegrate offenders as law-abiding citizens.

In this retrospective, I argue that we should also be guided by a third social force: The movement for evidence-based practice. In order to realise the potential of evidence-based practice, we need to support more and better research on sexual offender treatment. ..Source.. by R. Karl Hanson

Circles of Support and Accountability: Engaging Community Volunteers in the Management of High-Risk Sexual Offenders

2007 Canada:

Abstract:
The release to the community of a sexual offender is frequently accompanied by intense coverage in the news media. Too often, the type of coverage these releases receive serves only to force many offenders into hiding or out of one community and into another. Forced to move to another community, the scapegoating process starts all over again.

It is well known that secrecy and isolation are critical elements in sexual offending behaviour. Thus, forcing offenders into hiding does nothing to increase community safety or offender accountability and, arguably, increases the risk that new victims will be created. The most problematic releases are those in which sexual offenders arrive in a community with few or no links, and with little access to appropriate treatment and supervisory services.

This article outlines a restorative approach to the risk management of high-risk sexual offenders in Canada using professionally-facilitated volunteerism. The Circles of Support and Accountability model grew out of an ad hoc, faith-based response to a situation much like that described above in South-Central Ontario, Canada.

The resultant pilot project has since reached its twelfth anniversary and the model has proliferated both nationally and internationally. ..Source.. by
Robin J. Wilson, Humber College - Institute of Technology and Applied Learning -and- Andrew McWhinnie, Andrew McWhinnie Consulting -and- Janice E. Picheca, Government of Canada -and- Michelle Prinzo, Cognitive and Interpersonal Therapy Center -and- Franca Cortoni, Andrew McWhinnie Consulting



See articles HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE

Running in US HERE and in UK HERE


The Impact of Prison-Based Treatment on Sex Offender Recidivism: Evidence from Minnesota

March 2010 Minnesota:

The Minnesota Department of Corrections (DOC) recently completed a study that examined the impact of DOC sex offender treatment programming on recidivism. The study examined 2,040 sex offenders released from Minnesota prisons between 1990 and 2003. The average follow-up period to track recidivism for the 2,040 offenders was 9.3 years.

The DOC has provided sex offender treatment since 1978 when it opened the Transitional Sex Offender Treatment Program at the Minnesota Correctional Facility-Lino Lakes. Since its inception more than three decades ago, sex offender treatment programming has evolved to keep pace with changing practices in the fi eld. Consistent with evidence-based practices, the DOC places priority on treating sex offenders who pose a moderate to high risk for reoffending and provides treatment designed to address the specifi c factors that place offenders at risk for offending. ..Source: Full Report.. ..Source: Research in Brief.. Minnesota Dep't of Corrections
Key Findings
�� Sex offender treatment provided within the DOC reduced the risk of rearrest for a new sex offense by 27 percent

�� Participation in prison-based treatment lowered the risk of rearrest for a violent crime (both sex and non-sex offenses) by 18 percent

�� Prison-based treatment decreased the risk of rearrest for any offense by 12 percent




All Minnesota DOC Publications

The California Sex Offender Management Board (CASOMB) Releases Its January Progress Report

January 2009:

The California Sex Offender Management Board (CASOMB) Releases Its Progress Report:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND INTRODUCTION

The California Sex Offender Management Board (CASOMB) is directed by California Penal Code Section 9002, subdivision (H)(2) to provide a progress report to the Governor and the Legislature by January 2009. This Progress Report will detail those areas that are under assessment in preparation for a detailed plan and a series of recommendations in the January 2010 Report of Plan. In order to effectively ensure that CASOMB took a comprehensive approach in their planning process, committees were utilized whose backgrounds spanned the entire California justice system. Committees were developed in the following areas:

• Victim Services
• Investigation, Prosecution, Adjudication and Disposition
• Treatment
• Special Populations
• Re-entry, Housing and Supervision
• Registration and Notification
• Community Education
• Research

Detailed in this report are the specific topic areas that each committee is reviewing and gathering information in preparation for CASOMB’s recommendations, which will be detailed in the January 2010 report. Also, there are recommendations listed below that CASOMB views as critical to public safety and therefore are being made in this progress report.

For the remainder of this paper: by The California Sex Offender Management Board

Perceptions of Sex Offenders About Treatment

March 2009:

Abstract:
Surveying the views of sex offender clients can help ensure that treatment is relevant and responsive to client needs. The purpose of this exploratory study is to elicit sex offender clients' perceptions of their experiences in treatment in order to better understand the components of treatment perceived to be helpful in preventing reoffense. Samples (N = 338) of male sex offenders in outpatient group therapy are found to be generally satisfied with treatment services and have positive perceptions of treatment effectiveness. Offenders in treatment value the role of group therapy, and they find accountability, victim empathy, relapse prevention, and "good lives" concepts to be most helpful in managing their behavior. Their engagement in group therapy is assessed using the Group Engagement Measure, and a positive correlation is found between engagement and treatment satisfaction. Eliciting client opinions about the helpfulness of program content and process, and adjusting treatment protocols accordingly, is consistant with the principles of risk, need, and responsivity, a model recommended for therapeutic interventions with criminal offenders.

Levenson, J. S., Macgowan, M. J., Morin, J. W., Cotter, L. P. (2009). Perceptions of Sex Offenders About Treatment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, Vol. 21, No. 1, 35-56 (2009)

For the remainder of this paper: by Jill S. Levenson, Lynn University, Boca Raton, Florida, jlevenson@lynn.edu -AND- Mark J. Macgowan, Florida International University, Miami -AND- John W. Morin, Center for Offender Rehabilitation & Education, Fort Lauderdale, Florida -AND- Leo P. Cotter, SHARE Program, Tampa, Florida

Sex offender recidivism rates below expectations: more than 80% of sex offenders who underwent treatment did not reoffend

December 2002:

More than 80% of sex offenders who have undergone treatment do not reoffend within 15 years, according to preliminary results of a 15-year prospective study of 626 individuals reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

The study did not examine the efficacy of various forms of treatment, but it did find that sexual offenders who were compliant with their treatment were less likely to reoffend than those who were noncompliant.

The results of the study were reported by Dr. Fred Berlin, who is director of the National Institute for the Study, Prevention, and Treatment of Sexual Trauma, Baltimore, and by Gerard J. McGlone. Ph.D., a clinical fellow at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

The results are "a far cry from what people often think is occurring, particularly with a group of patients who are this serious, people with multiple prior offenses, people with pedophilia," Dr. Berlin said. "The notion that most of these people would quickly be back into trouble was simply not true."

The preliminary 15-year data update the group's 5-year study of the same individuals (Am. J. Forensic Psychiatry 12[3]:5-28, 1991). That study found an overall 9.7% recidivism rate.

The estimated rate of additional recidivism for the following 10 years was 9.3%, for a total of 19% over 15 years.

Both studies followed 626 individuals treated at the Johns Hopkins sexual disorders clinic between 1978 and 1990. Of those, 406 were pedophiles, 111 were exhibitionists, and 109 were characterized as "sexually aggressive," with most diagnosed as "paraphilic disorder not otherwise specified" or antisocial personality disorder.

The patients underwent a variety of treatments at the clinic, including individual, group, and family therapy. Approximately 40% of the patients received an-tiandrogenic drugs in an effort to lessen their sex drive.

Investigators examined three local and national databases for evidence of recidivism in the 5-year study.

Anyone who was charged with a sexual crime was included; conviction was not necessary.

For the 15-year follow-up, investigators have so far examined only Maryland state databases and have not yet examined national databases.

The 5-year study showed that 7.4% of pedophiles, 4.6% of sexual aggressives, and 23.4% of exhibitionists reoffended sexually The 15-year study added an additional 8.6% of pedophiles (total 16%), 10% of sexual aggressives (total 14.6%), and 10.8% of exhibitionists, (total 34.2%), the investigators said.

For the 15-year study, investigators have not yet reported recidivism rates for compliant vs. noncompliant patients. These data were reported at the 5-year follow-up.

For pedophiles, 2.9% of the treatment compliant and 11.1% of the noncompliant reoffended sexually For sexual aggressives, 2.8% of the compliant and 8.1% of the noncompliant reoffended sexually

And for exhibitionists, 12.5% of the compliant and 32.6% of the noncompliant reoffended sexually

On the issue of exhibitionists, Dr. Berlin observed, "Even with treatment, this is a very driven, compulsive disorder. The good news, though, is that in almost every instance where there was recidivism, it was a non-hands-on offense.

"These people were not recidivating by doing other things. With very few exceptions they were exposing. ... The more dangerous patients, the ones who had been sexually aggressive or who were pedophiles, had the lowest recidivism rates.

Nonsexual recidivism rates were considerably higher in all groups. At the 5-year follow-up, 9.2% of compliant pe dophiles and 26.2% of noncompliant pedophiles were charged with a nonsexual offense such as burglary. Among sexual aggressives, the rates were 14% of compliant patients and 29.7% of non-compliant patients. And among exhibitionists the rates were 10.4% of compliant patients and 4 1.9% of non compliant patients.

The study's results have important public policy implications, Dr. Berlin said.

Over the years, for example, legislatures in all 50 states and the District of Columbia have passed numerous laws involving the civil commitment, registration, and community notification of sexual offenders.

In addition, a federal law that took effect recently requires the states to notify the public about sexual offenders who are enrolled or working at college campuses.

The idea behind these registries and public notifications is the notion that sexual offenders are difficult to rehabilitate and have a particularly high rate of recidivism. (See related story page 5.)

But the data show that sexual offenders actually have a lower rate of recidivism that those who commit other kinds of crimes.

And some experts speculate that these new laws just might have the unintended consequence of actually increasing the risk of recidivism.

"We think that many of the people who seem to be doing well in our treatment program have done well because they could get jobs," Dr. Berlin said. "They could fit into their community.

"We now have these registries. Are [sexual offenders who have been punished and released going to be able to get housing? Are they going to be able to get work? Are we inadvertently actually going to make it more difficult for some of these people?"

..Source.. Clinical Psychiatry News, By Robert Finn

COPYRIGHT 2002 International Medical News Group
COPYRIGHT 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning


== Awaiting Confirmation of Study Type & Subjects ==
"According to a 1991 study of 626 patients conducted by Berlin's institute, five years after they had been treated through chemical castration fewer than ten percent had committed sexual offenses again. Of the most compliant patients, fewer than 5 percent committed new sexual acts. (Id.)"

TREATMENT AND REENTRY PRACTICES FOR SEX OFFENDERS: An Overview of States

September 2008:

Reagan Daly. Treatment and Reentry Practices for Sex Offenders: An Overview of States. New York: Vera Institute of Justice, 2008.

Executive Summary
Over the past 15 years, the response of the criminal justice system to people who have been convicted of a sex offense has become increasingly punitive, relying heavily on incarceration. Yet, a consequent increase in criminal justice costs has led some states to reconsider their response to sex offenders. Concerns about public safety and the protection of victims remain the primary focus, but many states have also invested in treatment and reentry programs as alternatives to incarceration for some people.

Although the content and structure of treatment and reentry programs vary considerably from one jurisdiction to another, few if any resources provide criminal justice officials and policymakers an overview of these programs or a comparative assessment of their effectiveness. This report attempts to address these issues by providing an overview and analysis of existing treatment and reentry practices for sex offenders who are involved with the criminal justice system. It focuses, specifically, on four broad areas of practice: treatment in prison, treatment under community supervision, reentry programming, and community supervision. Interviews with state officials and treatment providers from 37 states that responded to our survey revealed several findings:

• In both prison and community settings, the treatment of sex offenders is generally grounded in evidence-based practices, especially cognitive-behavioral therapy. In general, treatment is much more available in the community than in institutional settings.

• In most of the participating states, community-based treatment for sex offenders is supported, at least in part, by collecting fees from those in treatment—a circumstance that may limit access to these programs.

• Standardized risk assessment tools such as the STATIC-99 are now widely used nationally in both prison- and community-based treatment programs. Needs assessment tools, especially the ACUTE, are becoming more prevalent in community supervision.

• No reentry initiatives were found that specifically target sex offenders. Although eligible for general reentry programming in most states, people convicted of a sexual offense have few, if any, options for reentry programming that addresses their unique needs.

eAdvocate Note: Further, the Second Chance Act (HR-1593) passed in 2008, specifically PROHIBITS sex offenders from any programs funded by this Act.
SEC. 212. RESPONSIBLE REINTEGRATION OF OFFENDERS.
(a) Eligible Offenders-
(1) IN GENERAL- In this section, the term `eligible offender' means an individual who--

(A) is 18 years of age or older;

(B) has been convicted as an adult and imprisoned under Federal or State law;

(C) has never been convicted of a violent or sex-related offense; and

(D) except as provided in paragraph (2), has been released from a prison or jail for not more than 180 days before the date on which the individual begins participating in a grant program carried out under this section.

• Correctional institutions and community supervision agencies in most states share information about the case histories and treatment plans of sex offenders who are
returning to the community from prison. Research suggests that this type of inter-agency communication can help reduce recidivism.

• In general, community supervision agencies manage risk and provide services. Research suggests that this is an effective approach to reducing recidivism.

• A limited number of states are conducting research on their own treatment, reentry, and supervision initiatives. Almost no studies have examined these programs from a cost-benefit perspective.

For the remainder of this study: by Reagan Daly

A 25-Year Follow-Up of Cognitive/Behavioral Therapy with 7,275 Sexual Offenders

2002:

Abstract:
Outcome data are presented, grouped into 5-year cohorts, for 7,275 sexual offenders entering a cognitive/behavioral treatment program. Assessment variables included treatment completion, self-admission of covert and/or overt deviant behaviors, the presence of deviant sexual arousal, or being recharged for any sexual crime (regardless of plea or conviction). It proved possible to follow 62% for the cohort at 5 years after initiating treatment, but follow-up completion rates decreased with time.

Outcomes were significantly different based on offender subtype, with child molesters and exhibitionists achieving better overall success than pedophiles or rapists. Prematurely terminating treatment was a strong indicator of committing a new sexual offense. Of interest was the general improvement of success rates over each successive 5-year period for many types of offenders.

Unfortunately, failure rates remained comparatively high for rapists (20%) and homosexual pedophiles (16%), regardless of when they were treated over the 25-year period. Implications for clinical practice and future research are drawn. ..more.. by Barry M. Maletzky, Oregon Health Sciences University -and- Cynthia Steinhauser, The Sexual Abuse Clinic