2010:
Abstract:
With the 2006 passage of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act (AWA), the U.S. Congress set forth a range of minimum standards governing the operation of sex offender registration and notification (SORN) systems throughout the nation. Many of these standards are based on the AWA’s uniform system of registrant classification, which distinguishes registrants solely based on offense history and the nature of the conviction offense, without regard for additional risk factors.
The current study evaluates the impact of the federal registration classification system on the distribution of individuals within state sex offender registries, specifically drawing on the experiences of Ohio and Oklahoma, two of the first states to undertake a reclassification of their registrant populations under the new federal guidelines.
The findings indicate that the federal reclassification process produces a redistribution of registrants from lower SORN levels to higher ones and reveals statistically significant differences between newly reclassified "high-risk" individuals and those designated as high risk under prior registration classification systems.
Findings also suggest that juveniles and those potentially subject to AWA’s retroactivity provisions may be disproportionately placed into the highest SORN tiers. Implications of these findings for practice and public policy are discussed.
For the remainder of this paper: by Andrew J. Harris, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Andrew_Harris@uml.edu -AND- Christopher Lobanov-Rostovsky, Colorado Sex Offender Management Board, Colorado Division of Criminal Justice -AND- Jill S. Levenson, Lynn University
eAdvocate Note: This study proves that the truth does not matter, the government wants sex offenders to be found DANGEROUS as a class, regardless of the truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment